Clarification of Tax Treatment of Covered Loan Forgiveness
Clarification of Tax Treatment of Covered Loan Forgiveness
CARES Act Sec. 1102 provides that a recipient of a PPP loan may use the loan proceeds to pay payroll costs, certain employee benefits relating to healthcare, interest on mortgage obligations, rent, utilities, and interest on any other existing debt obligations. If a PPP loan recipient uses their PPP loan to pay those costs, they can have their loan forgiven in an amount equal to those costs. PPP loan forgiveness doesn’t give rise to taxable income and the Code generally doesn’t allow a taxpayer to deduct expenses that are paid with tax exempt income.
New law
COVIDTRA clarifies taxpayers whose PPP loans are forgiven are allowed deductions for otherwise deductible expenses paid with the proceeds of a PPP loan, and that the tax basis and other attributes of the borrower’s assets will not be reduced as a result of the loan forgiveness. (CARES Act section 1102 as clarified by COVIDTRA Sec. 276)
Effective date
This provision is effective as of the date of enactment of the CARES Act.
AS of December 21, 2020, more details of recent COVID-19 tax related developments: https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-116HR133SA-RCP-116-68.pdf
Other points of interests:
Business Meals Fully Deductible in 2021 and 2022
Employee Retention Tax Credit and Paid Sick/Family Leave Credits
Charitable Contributions
Extension of Certain Deferred Payroll Taxes
From the FTB site 03/23/2022:
On September 9, 2020, Assembly Bill (AB) 1577 (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act Conformity) was enacted which allowed an income exclusion for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2020, for forgiven PPP loans.
On April 29, 2021, AB 80 (Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) Conformity) was enacted which allowed the additional income exclusion for second draw PPP loans and Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) advance grants and allowed the deduction of expenses, basis adjustments, and tax attribution adjustments for qualifying taxpayers, for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2019.
The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) (Public Law 117-2) was enacted on March 11, 2021. The ARPA expanded the PPP to include certain nonprofit entities and certain internet publishing organizations. California law does not conform to this expansion of PPP eligibility.
The Paycheck Protection Program Extension Act (PPPEA) (Public Law 117-6) was enacted on March 30, 2021, and extended the covered period of the PPP from March 31, 2021, through June 30, 2021. California law does not conform to this extension and does not allow an exclusion from income for PPP loans made after March 31, 2021.
On February 9, 2022, Senate Bill (SB) 113 (Economic Relief) was enacted to allow an income exclusion for Shuttered Venue Operator (SVO) grants provided under CAA for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2019 and for Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF) grants provided under ARPA for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2020. SB 113 also allows the deduction of expenses, basis adjustments, and tax attribution adjustments for qualifying taxpayers for SVO and RRF grants.
Income exclusion
For California purposes, forgiven PPP loans, SVO grants, and RRF grants are excluded from gross income. However, this does not include PPP loans forgiven under the PPPEA.
Deductions and other adjustments
AB 80
To qualify for expense deductions, basis adjustments, and lack of reduction of tax attributes related to AB 80, you must meet the following qualifications.
- Your business cannot be publicly traded
- You meet the 25% gross receipts reduction qualifications
If your forgiven loan relates to an EIDL Grant or Targeted EIDL Advance, you are not required to meet these qualifications to deduct expenses.
SB 113
To qualify for expense deductions, basis adjustments, and lack of reduction of tax attributes related to an SOV grant under SB 113, you must meet the following qualifications.
- Your business cannot be publicly traded.
- You meet the 25% gross receipts reduction qualifications.
If your forgiven loan relates to an RRF, you are not required to meet these qualifications to deduct expenses.
The treatment of deductions, basis, and tax attributes for California income tax purposes may differ from the federal income tax treatment. For federal qualifications regarding income tax treatment, visit Coronavirus Tax Relief for Businesses and Tax-Exempt Entities.
25% reduction from gross receipts
California conforms to the federal gross receipts test requiring a 25% or greater reduction in gross receipts and will therefore follow the rationale of this related federal guidance.
For additional information, visit Section 311 of the CAA, 2021, Revenue and Taxation Code (RTC) section 17131.8(g)(3)), and Small Business Administration (SBA) guidance.
For additional information on the RRF grants, visit Section 5003 of the ARPA, RTC 17158.2(a), and SBA guidance.
We hope you found this short article about recent tax clarifications of tax treatment and the PPP loan forgiveness program helpful. For more information, talk to your tax advisor to see what else you can or should do to protect yourself and take full advantage of the unique opportunities provided by PPP loans. If you have additional questions or need expert tax or family office advice that’s refreshingly objective (we never sell investments), please contact us at Info@GROCO.com or visit www.GROCO.com. Unfortunately, we no longer give advice to other tax professionals gratis.
A proud sponsor of the American Dreams Show. Find your path in life to success and happiness…
Sentimental Value Vs. Market Value? Knowing The Difference Sells Homes
Sentimental Value Vs. Market Value? Knowing The Difference Sells Homes By Pablo Santibanez When selling your home today and in this market, it is critical to price your home properly for a successful sale. Gone are the days when you could list your home at the top of the market, selling your home above what…
Taxes Aimed at the Wealthy Could Send Canadian Entrepreneurs Fleeing
Taxes Aimed at the Wealthy Could Send Canadian Entrepreneurs Fleeing By Alan Olsen The idea of taxing the rich is certainly not new, and neither are the negative effects that this philosophy can cause. While the United States is know for it’s broken tax system which attempts to punish the wealthy simply for being wealthy,…
More Companies Offering New Way to Lower Taxes on Pensions
More Companies Offering New Way to Lower Taxes on Pensions By Alan Olsen It used to be that many, if not most, companies offered the benefit of a pension fund to those employees who eventually retired with the company after many years of service. As times have changed, benefit packages have become less attractive or…
Doing Business in China – Common War Stories
Doing Business in China – Common War Stories As time passes, I hear from reliable sources the same type of stories, over and over, about doing business in China. So, I thought I’d pass along some recent reviews: Assume a taxpayer sets up a Wholly-Owned Foreign Enterprise (W.O.F.E.) and manufactures products (directly or via a…