Is Corporate America Getting Away With Too Little Tax?
It’s an argument that’s all too common in the business world: big multi-national companies don’t pay their fair share of taxes. A new study will only serve to add more fuel to the fire, as according to its findings, seven of the 30 biggest companies in the United States reportedly paid more to their CEOs in 2013 than they did in taxes.
The Companies
The seven companies who showed up on the list included Ford, Verizon, Boeing, General Motors, Citigroup, Chevron and JPMorgan Chase & Co. According to the study, which was conducted by the Institute for Policy Studies and the Center for Effective Government, the average CEO salary for each of these seven companies was $17.3 million.
The Other Side of the Story
However, not all of these companies agree with the numbers. For its part Verizon refutes the claim that it paid more to its CEO than it did in income taxes. The company issued a statement claiming that its total income tax bill in 2013 was $422 million. The company did not disclose a breakdown between state and federal amounts, but it did state that its CEO made much less than what it paid in federal income tax.
More Debate
All of the companies, except JPMorgan Chase, have had some kind of response to the study, and each of the companies have stressed that they abide by all tax laws and regulations, both here and abroad.
Unpleasant Tax Surprise for Thousands of IRA Holders
Unpleasant Tax Surprise for Thousands of IRA Holders Imagine getting a letter in the mail telling you that you owe more than $24,000 in taxes, with about a fourth of that total being because of late penalties. That’s the kind of surprise that nobody ever wants to get. However, that’s exactly what happened to one…
Corporate Tax Planning: Mergers, Acquisitions and Reorganizations
Corporate Tax Planning: Mergers, Acquisitions and Reorganizations by Greenstein, Rogoff, Olsen & Co., LLP In today’s ever-changing business world, a corporation often needs to reconstruct its form for economic survival and growth. These corporate divisions and combinations usually involve exchanges of stock and property, and normally would be taxable transactions. However, Congress enacted certain provisions…
General Rules for Corporate Reorganization
General Rules for Corporate Reorganization In order for a transaction to be given non-recognition treatment under the reorganization provisions, it must meet certain requirements. • The reorganization must meet certain tests in the Regulations regarding “continuity of interest” and “continuity of business enterprise.” • The reorganization must be conducted according to one of seven patterns…
Accepted Patterns for Corporate Reorganization: Types A-G
Accepted Patterns for Corporate Reorganization:Types A-G The seven qualifying patterns of reorganization described in IRC section 368(a)(1)(A) through (G), are as follows: •Type A- a statutory merger or consolidation; •Type B- the acquisition by one corporation, in exchange solely for all or a part of its voting stock (or in exchange solely for all or…