The Best Leadership Style

THE BEST LEADERSHIP STYLE

The Best Leadership Style

Recently I took part in an interview with leadership guru Ken Blanchard. Ken was just finishing up his book, Fit at Last, in which he shares how after years of failing to meet his personal fitness goals he was finally able to succeed by applying situational leadership to his fitness routine. One of the questions which we asked Ken was what leadership style he thinks is the best. His answer was simple and rang with universal truth. Since then I have analyzed what Ken had to say and have come to realize what the best leadership style really is.

There are hundreds of different leadership styles and philosophies out there in the world like: supporting, coaching, delegating, directing; however which is the best? Is it the football coach yelling drills at his players that will condition them into a game-winning team? Or is it the college professor who instead of serving as a lecturer encourages his pupils to think and grasp the concepts for themselves? What if the professor and football coach switched positions where the coach shouted out information, and the professor waited for the football team to learn what they needed from practice in order to train themselves? Perhaps the better question we should be asking is which leadership style do you best react to? The concept of leadership is not at all systematic in nature. It takes years to develop and requires the leader to understand his environment and the motivation and competency levels of those with whom he is working.

There are four types of leadership styles: Directing, Coaching, Supporting, and Delegating

  1. The Directing leadership style is one where the leader takes control of the situation. He relies on his knowledge and personal experiences to lead a group, allowing them very little control to lead themselves. This method is best applied to a group which is enthusiastic and highly motivated to get a job done, however they lack the competence to get things done themselves.
  2. The next step up from Directing is the Coaching Style. Coaching involves getting involved with an individual or team who still lack competence in their area of expertise. They require a high level of direction, as well as advice and encouragement in order to build both their confidence and competence.
  3. The directing style of leadership is designed for individuals who are gaining competence in their field, however, they still lack confidence in themselves and their own abilities. They need a high level of encouragement and to be told that they can succeed.
  4. The Delegating Style is designed for individuals who have grown into a high level of confidence, motivation, and competence. They don’t necessarily need to be directed anymore and are capable of mentoring others. Individuals who have reached this level can be delegated projects and best benefit when they are the ones to approach you, as their leader, for advice and counsel.

Is there one leadership style that is better than the other? No. What it all boils down to is the competence and commitment levels of the individuals whom you are trying to lead. Something to keep in mind is that just because an individual may react best to the delegating style in one area of his life, doesn’t mean that the delegating style would be right for him or her in another area. How motivated and competent an individual is at the task given is the determining factor for which leadership style will work best for them.

 

Posted in
Unpleasant Tax Surprise for Thousands of IRA Holders

Unpleasant Tax Surprise for Thousands of IRA Holders

Unpleasant Tax Surprise for Thousands of IRA Holders Imagine getting a letter in the mail telling you that you owe more than $24,000 in taxes, with about a fourth of that total being because of late penalties. That’s the kind of surprise that nobody ever wants to get. However, that’s exactly what happened to one…

Corporate Tax Planning: Mergers, Acquisitions and Reorganizations

Corporate Tax Planning: Mergers, Acquisitions and Reorganizations

Corporate Tax Planning: Mergers, Acquisitions and Reorganizations by Greenstein, Rogoff, Olsen & Co., LLP In today’s ever-changing business world, a corporation often needs to reconstruct its form for economic survival and growth. These corporate divisions and combinations usually involve exchanges of stock and property, and normally would be taxable transactions. However, Congress enacted certain provisions…

General Rules for Corporate Reorganization

General Rules for Corporate Reorganization In order for a transaction to be given non-recognition treatment under the reorganization provisions, it must meet certain requirements. • The reorganization must meet certain tests in the Regulations regarding “continuity of interest” and “continuity of business enterprise.” • The reorganization must be conducted according to one of seven patterns…

Accepted Patterns for Corporate Reorganization: Types A-G

Accepted Patterns for Corporate Reorganization: Types A-G

Accepted Patterns for Corporate Reorganization:Types A-G The seven qualifying patterns of reorganization described in IRC section 368(a)(1)(A) through (G), are as follows: •Type A- a statutory merger or consolidation; •Type B- the acquisition by one corporation, in exchange solely for all or a part of its voting stock (or in exchange solely for all or…