Another Poor Showing for the U.S. Tax System

Another Poor Showing for the U.S. Tax System

Another poor showing for the U.S. tax system?  It seems that every day a new list of rankings is released about the locations where we live. Which state is best for owning a home, or which city has the highest vitality rate, are some of the topics discussed in previous lists, for example. Everyone has seen these types of stories and while some of these lists can be important or helpful, others are funny or just plain silly. Regardless, of the content, many of us enjoy seeing where our locations rank in the standings.

Globally Inferior
When it comes to tax lists, however, it seems that there isn’t too much to be proud of for the United States when compared to many other countries around the world. The Tax Foundation recently released its International Tax Competitiveness Index (ITCI) for the year 2014. The ITCI is used to measure tax system Competitiveness of the 34 countries that are part of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

Rating Factors
The criteria for the rankings is based on five key factors, which include:

  • Corporate Income Taxes
  • Property taxes
  • Consumption taxes
  • Individual taxes
  • Treatment of foreign earnings

And the Winner Is…
Here’s a hint, it’s not the U.S. Estonia comes in at number one on the list with the most competitive tax system. So we’re not number one but the U.S. must be somewhere high on the list, right? After all, we drive the world economy in many ways. Yes, while it’s true that the United States helps drive the world economy, it still apparently lacks the goods in its tax system. In fact, we didn’t even crack the top ten. After Estonia, the rest of the top ten includes:

  1. New Zealand
  2. Switzerland
  3. Sweden
  4. Australia
  5. Luxembourg
  6. Netherlands
  7. Slovak Republic
  8. Turkey
  9. Slovenia

Bad Showing for the United States
So where did the U.S. end up then, anyways? Of the 34 countries included in the rankings, the U.S landed in the number 32 spot. That means the good old red, white and blue only beat two other countries in the rankings, Portugal and France. So why did the U.S. perform so poorly?

Corporate Taxes
One of the biggest reasons the ITCI ranks America’s tax system as one of the least competitive is because of the country’s corporate tax system. We have discussed this issue many times before and it’s something that will continue to be a problem for America until the government is willing to implement real tax change.

A Look at the Numbers
The numbers don’t lie. Among all 34 countries in the OECD, the United States has the highest corporate tax rate at 39.1 percent. It gets worse; besides the U.S. every other country in the OECD, with the exception of Chile and Norway have reduced corporate tax rates since the year 2000. Meantime, Ireland has the lowest rate at 12.5 percent, while the average rate is 25.4 percent.

Global Taxes
The United States is also given low marks because if its global tax on corporations. These global taxes have led several large companies to recently create corporate centers in foreign countries with friendlier tax systems. Compare the U.S.’s system to Estonia’s, which exempts 100 percent of any foreign profit that is earned by domestic companies from domestic taxation, and there’s really no comparison.

Work to Do
Corporate and global taxes weren’t the only problem for America. The country also receives low grades for property taxes, estate taxes and high individual income taxes, as well. These numbers clearly indicate that the United States’ tax system definitely has room for improvement.

We hope you found this article about “10 Ways to Avoid a Tax Audit” helpful.  If you have questions or need expert tax or family office advice that’s refreshingly objective (we never sell investments), please contact us or visit our Family office page  or our website at www.GROCO.com.  Unfortunately, we no longer give advice to other tax professionals gratis.

To receive our free newsletter, contact us here.

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel for more updates.

Considerately yours,

GROCO, GROCO Tax, GROCO Technology, GROCO Advisory Services, GROCO Consulting Services, GROCO Relationship Services, GROCO Consulting/Advisory Services, GROCO Family Office Wealth, and GROCO Family Office Services.

Alan Olsen, CPA

 

 

Alan L. Olsen, CPA, Wikipedia Bio

 

 

 

Proud sponsor of the AD Show.

American-Dreams-Show-Accounting-firm-in-ca-cpa-tax-advisors-groco-alan-olsen

Posted in
How to Raise Children That Become Entrepreneurs

How to Raise Children That Become Entrepreneurs

How to Raise Children That Become Entrepreneurs By Lauren Hidden Ever since my kids can remember, I’ve worked from home. Sometimes I have to remind them that I’m not sitting home playing with their toys or eating bon-bons when they’re at the babysitter or at school, but for the most part they “get it”. As…

Transferring Assets to a Second Spouse (and to children from the first)

Transferring Assets to a Second Spouse (and to children from the first)

Transferring Assets to a Second Spouse (and to children from the first) Elizabeth and Thomas Carr (names fictitious), both in their late 60s, each have one child from a prior marriage. During the 30-plus years of their marriage, they each have accumulated an estate of over $5 million. The full $1.5 million credit against estate…

roth IRA

The Roth IRA Advantage: A Closer Look

The Roth IRA Advantage: A Closer Look Since its debut in 1997, the Roth IRA, naturally enough, has been sold mainly as a retirement  account. To be sure, the prospect of a stream of tax-free income to support a comfortable retirement is a powerful stimulant. To earn that freedom from taxes, you do have to…

Classification of Accepted Patterns of Reorganization

Classification of Accepted Patterns of Reorganization

Classification of Accepted Patterns of Reorganization The seven acceptable patterns of reorganization may be classified into three categories: Acquisitive, Divisive, Re-capitalizing. Acquisitive reorganizations Type “A,” “B”, “C,” and acquisitive D, in which one Corporation acquires another corporation’s stock, assets, or some combination of both. Divisive reorganization Type D involves the division of one corporation into…