How Much Are Fortune 500 Companies Saving in Taxes?

shutterstock_174522404

 

It’s a well-known fact that many of the richest companies in America have become so financially successful thanks in large part to the tax-savings methods they employ, not the least of which is keeping large amounts of income overseas. These American companies have no problem doing business stateside, but because the U.S. has some of the highest corporate tax rates in the world, they can save millions in taxes by leaving that money in the country where it was earned.

In fact, according to a recent report from Citizens for Tax Justice, the largest Fortune 500 companies in America are storing as much as $2.5 trillion in foreign countries, which is $400 million more than last year. This is not hidden money, stored away in secret bank accounts, mind you, but rather revenue legally earned and held overseas. So why not bring the money back to the U.S.? As long as it stays overseas where it was earned the IRS can’t tax those earnings.

Of course, some people feel that isn’t fair, including the organization Citizens for Tax Justice, which wants the government to tax all income earned by U.S. companies, no matter what country it’s earned in. The problem with that scenario is that companies might decide to simply move their headquarters to other countries in order to avoid this extra tax, which could cost the country even more tax revenue, as well as jobs.

President Obama has recently proposed a 19 percent global minimum tax, which means any foreign subsidiary of a U.S. company that pays at least 19 percent in overseas taxes would be allowed to bring that money back to America without being taxed again stateside.

Of course, both current presidential candidates have their opinion on the matter. Donald Trump wants to significantly lower the corporate tax rate and combine it with a one-time 10 percent tax on any income being held in foreign countries. This could help give companies more of an incentive to bring the money home to the U.S. Hillary Clinton reportedly wants to keep the current standards but she also wants to add an “exit tax” for companies that leave.

Either way, it’s likely that companies will continue to keep foreign earnings overseas unless the government creates a more tax-friendly environment for American corporations.

You also might like the article Study Shows Benefit of Lower Corporate Tax

http://fortune.com/2016/10/06/fortune-500-tax-haven/

Posted in
Tech ETFs Were a Hot Commodity in January Trading

Tech ETFs Were a Hot Commodity in January Trading

Tech ETFs Were a Hot Commodity in January Trading No matter what happens in the stock market, it seems that technology always plays a huge role in investing. Tech stocks are often some of the most popular stocks available and many fortunes have been earned and/or lost through investments in technology. In fact, recently, it…

Are Republicans Reconsidering Tax Cuts for the Wealthy?

Are Republicans Reconsidering Tax Cuts for the Wealthy?

Are Republicans Reconsidering Tax Cuts for the Wealthy? While Republicans continue to promise tax cuts for everyone, most media pundits and Democrats claim that those plans will only help the wealthy. That’s an argument that will never end, but could it be possible that Republicans are changing their tune? There is growing speculation that Republicans…

rich with higher taxes

Gouging the Rich With Higher Taxes is Not Working in Connecticut

Gouging the Rich With Higher Taxes is Not Working in Connecticut It’s no secret that our nation’s tax code is designed to get more from the rich than from the other working classes. Federal tax rates are higher for the wealthy, as are many states’ income tax laws. In fact, many states take direct aim…

Could the Wealthy Still Pay Obamacare Tax After Trump Plan Replacement?

Could the Wealthy Still Pay Obamacare Tax After Trump Plan Replacement?

Could the Wealthy Still Pay Obamacare Tax After Trump Plan Replacement? It’s now June and the fight over the nation’s healthcare bill is still ongoing. It’s not that lawmakers aren’t trying to get something done that would ultimately replace Obamacare, but as with most things in Washington, it’s a slow-moving process. The House’s first attempt…