Which Tax Law Is Really Hurting Silicon Valley?

Silicon Valley is known for a lot of things. Some of the world’s greatest technological advances and ideas have come from companies located in the Silicon Valley. Likewise, some of the world’s most innovative and largest companies were born in Silicon Valley and still call it home today. Many people have found great success and riches in Silicon Valley, including many employees who helped build companies from the ground up.

There is a big problem, though, for many of these kinds of employees. There is a tax provision that is really hurting people who have worked for many years for start-ups or newer companies and have helped them become successful and valuable companies. However, when it coms time for many of these employees to leave their job or simply to cash out their stock options, they can’t really afford to pay the required cash outlay.

This problem should have been fixed when companies were allowed to give employees incentive stock options. However, in 1982, Congress changed that rule when it turned exercising an incentive stock option into a tax preference as part of the AMT. That meant any gain on the exercise of incentive stock was now taxed. This is very problematic for any employee in this boat, which is having a hard time exercising his or her options. In some cases, even if they can’t sell the stock, some employees end up owing tax on phantom income but they have no money to pay for it.

This tax provision is clearly causing problem for many people who have helped make Silicon Valley what it is today. And it’s a problem that the government should fix.

Posted in
Unpleasant Tax Surprise for Thousands of IRA Holders

Unpleasant Tax Surprise for Thousands of IRA Holders

Unpleasant Tax Surprise for Thousands of IRA Holders Imagine getting a letter in the mail telling you that you owe more than $24,000 in taxes, with about a fourth of that total being because of late penalties. That’s the kind of surprise that nobody ever wants to get. However, that’s exactly what happened to one…

Corporate Tax Planning: Mergers, Acquisitions and Reorganizations

Corporate Tax Planning: Mergers, Acquisitions and Reorganizations

Corporate Tax Planning: Mergers, Acquisitions and Reorganizations by Greenstein, Rogoff, Olsen & Co., LLP In today’s ever-changing business world, a corporation often needs to reconstruct its form for economic survival and growth. These corporate divisions and combinations usually involve exchanges of stock and property, and normally would be taxable transactions. However, Congress enacted certain provisions…

General Rules for Corporate Reorganization

General Rules for Corporate Reorganization In order for a transaction to be given non-recognition treatment under the reorganization provisions, it must meet certain requirements. • The reorganization must meet certain tests in the Regulations regarding “continuity of interest” and “continuity of business enterprise.” • The reorganization must be conducted according to one of seven patterns…

Accepted Patterns for Corporate Reorganization: Types A-G

Accepted Patterns for Corporate Reorganization: Types A-G

Accepted Patterns for Corporate Reorganization:Types A-G The seven qualifying patterns of reorganization described in IRC section 368(a)(1)(A) through (G), are as follows: •Type A- a statutory merger or consolidation; •Type B- the acquisition by one corporation, in exchange solely for all or a part of its voting stock (or in exchange solely for all or…