2010 Tax Relief Act creates a 100% writeoff for heavy SUVs used entirely for business: HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]OLD RULE:
A calendar year taxpayer bought a $50,000 heavy SUV in June of 2010 and used it 100% for business in 2010. It may write off $40,000 of the cost of the vehicle on its 2010 return, as follows:

… $25,000 expensing deduction (Sec. 179(b)(6) Limit, see below under “History”), plus
… $12,500 of bonus first year depreciation ($50,000 − $25,000 of expensing × .50 = $12,500), plus
… $2,500 of regular first-year depreciation ($50,000 − $25,000 of expensing − $12,500 bonus depreciation × .20 = $2,500.

NEW Rule:
Now 100% first-year writeoffs for heavy SUVs. Under the 2010 Tax Relief Act, the bonus first-year depreciation percentage is 100% (instead of 50%) for bonus-depreciation-eligible “qualified property” that is generally (1) placed in service after Sept. 8, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2012, and (2) acquired by the taxpayer after Sept. 8, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2012. Qualified property includes property to which MACRS applies with a recovery period of 20 years or less. Autos and trucks are 5-year MACRS property and thus qualify for bonus depreciation (assuming business use exceeds 50% of total use). (Code Sec. 168(k)(2)(D))

Thus, a taxpayer that buys and places in service a new heavy SUV after Sept. 8, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2012, and uses it 100% for business, may write off its entire cost in the placed-in-service year. There is no specific rule barring this result for heavy SUVs. Thus, if the taxpayer in our illustration above had bought the heavy SUV in, say, October of 2010, it could write off the full $50,000 cost of the vehicle on its 2010 return.

History Repeats Itself

The old George Bush Loophole that, for about 2 years, allowed people to write-off 100% of the cost of their Hummer used for business…that was ended 10/22/2004:

Heavy SUVs—those with a GVW rating of more than 6,000 pounds—are exempt from the luxury auto dollar caps because they fall outside of the definition of a passenger auto in Code Sec. 280F(d)(5).. To deal with this “SUV tax loophole,” the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-357) imposed a limit on the expensing of heavy SUVs. Under Code Sec. 179(b)(6), not more than $25,000 of the cost of a heavy SUV placed in service after Oct. 22, 2004 may be expensed under Code Sec. 179. These rules apply, with some exceptions, to SUVs rated at 14,000 pounds GVW or less.

If you use your SUV less than 100%, all these rules apply based on the percentage of business use for the SUV. So, if based on mileage during the year, you use an SUV 80% for business and 20% for personal use, you would apply these rules to the 80% business use portion of the costs of the SUV. Below 50% business use, no Sec. 179 deduction is allowed.

Political comment: On this issue, Presidents Obama and Bush came to the same conclusion, which upset many people who can’t afford heavy SUVs and write them off in the 1st year as a tax deduction.

Feel free to call or write us if you need assistance with this issue.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Posted in

Communication Between Managers and their Employees

By Emily Topham Communication Between Managers and Their Employees   Managers have a daunting task—finding the right level of communication between them and their employees. It can be difficult for new managers to transition into the level of communication that is required by a leadership position. But discovering how to communicate well can make or…

Which States Are Good, and Bad, for Taxes?

How attached are you to the state you live in? Although most people would rather not relocate, where a person lives can actually make a huge difference in his or her tax bill. That’s because Kiplinger recently released its list of the most and least “tax-friendly” states when it comes to taxes. The business publisher…

How Are Some Big U.S. Companies Shrinking Their Tax Bill?

Every company wants to save on its tax bill. Although tax inversions have been making a lot of news lately, there are many other methods that corporations use to cut back on their taxes. In fact, seven companies in the S&P 500 index, including some big names that everyone is familiar with, have been able…

Democrats Take Dead Aim at Tax Inversions

The democrat lead U.S. Senate has been making a lot of noise lately regarding tax inversions, the practice of U.S. companies moving their corporate headquarters overseas in order to avoid the high price of overbearing U.S. corporate taxes. Those senators have apparently made good on a recent promise that they would look to put a…