2010 Tax Relief Act creates a 100% writeoff for heavy SUVs used entirely for business: HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]OLD RULE:
A calendar year taxpayer bought a $50,000 heavy SUV in June of 2010 and used it 100% for business in 2010. It may write off $40,000 of the cost of the vehicle on its 2010 return, as follows:

… $25,000 expensing deduction (Sec. 179(b)(6) Limit, see below under “History”), plus
… $12,500 of bonus first year depreciation ($50,000 − $25,000 of expensing × .50 = $12,500), plus
… $2,500 of regular first-year depreciation ($50,000 − $25,000 of expensing − $12,500 bonus depreciation × .20 = $2,500.

NEW Rule:
Now 100% first-year writeoffs for heavy SUVs. Under the 2010 Tax Relief Act, the bonus first-year depreciation percentage is 100% (instead of 50%) for bonus-depreciation-eligible “qualified property” that is generally (1) placed in service after Sept. 8, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2012, and (2) acquired by the taxpayer after Sept. 8, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2012. Qualified property includes property to which MACRS applies with a recovery period of 20 years or less. Autos and trucks are 5-year MACRS property and thus qualify for bonus depreciation (assuming business use exceeds 50% of total use). (Code Sec. 168(k)(2)(D))

Thus, a taxpayer that buys and places in service a new heavy SUV after Sept. 8, 2010 and before Jan. 1, 2012, and uses it 100% for business, may write off its entire cost in the placed-in-service year. There is no specific rule barring this result for heavy SUVs. Thus, if the taxpayer in our illustration above had bought the heavy SUV in, say, October of 2010, it could write off the full $50,000 cost of the vehicle on its 2010 return.

History Repeats Itself

The old George Bush Loophole that, for about 2 years, allowed people to write-off 100% of the cost of their Hummer used for business…that was ended 10/22/2004:

Heavy SUVs—those with a GVW rating of more than 6,000 pounds—are exempt from the luxury auto dollar caps because they fall outside of the definition of a passenger auto in Code Sec. 280F(d)(5).. To deal with this “SUV tax loophole,” the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-357) imposed a limit on the expensing of heavy SUVs. Under Code Sec. 179(b)(6), not more than $25,000 of the cost of a heavy SUV placed in service after Oct. 22, 2004 may be expensed under Code Sec. 179. These rules apply, with some exceptions, to SUVs rated at 14,000 pounds GVW or less.

If you use your SUV less than 100%, all these rules apply based on the percentage of business use for the SUV. So, if based on mileage during the year, you use an SUV 80% for business and 20% for personal use, you would apply these rules to the 80% business use portion of the costs of the SUV. Below 50% business use, no Sec. 179 deduction is allowed.

Political comment: On this issue, Presidents Obama and Bush came to the same conclusion, which upset many people who can’t afford heavy SUVs and write them off in the 1st year as a tax deduction.

Feel free to call or write us if you need assistance with this issue.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Posted in
How Some Big Companies Are Maximizing Their Tax Benefit

How Some Big Companies Are Maximizing Their Tax Benefit

How Some Big Companies Are Maximizing Their Tax Benefit There’s no question that the IRS is always looking for ways to get every penny they can from the nation’s taxpayers, whether they be individuals or businesses. On the other hand, many are also doing whatever they can to pay as little as possible, some, even…

Federal Government Still Facing Huge Deficit

Federal Government Still Facing Huge Deficit

Federal Government Still Facing Huge Deficit Does it seem like no matter how much money the federal government collects in tax revenue, they will still never have enough? For a lot of people the, answer is a resounding “yes.” The country’s Monthly Treasury Statement lends even more credence to that belief.  What does the Treasury…

The IRS is Not a Bully – You can poke a bully in the nose.

The IRS is Not a Bully You can poke a bully in the nose. This is the third installment of “The IRS is Not a Bully” series, identifying taxpayer concerns and the difficult position in which Congress puts the IRS. Namely, applying ever increasing pressure to operate in ways its founders never intended, until it’s…

Could You Pay More to Drink Soda in Berkeley?

Could You Pay More to Drink Soda in Berkeley?

Could You Pay More to Drink Soda in Berkeley? We all know that obesity is a problem in our country. Activists and other interested parties continue to work on ways to help curb this growing problem. Indeed, obesity is neither good for individuals or for our country. However, would creating a new tax to help…