How Much Did California Taxes Affect NBA Free Agency?
The NBA finals are now in the rear view mirror, as is the league’s draft. In fact, the free agency period has largely ended as well, as far as the big-time impact players are concerned. It was an unusual year for free agency, as some of the most recognizable and marketable teams were mostly shut out in the free agent frenzy, including the New York Knicks and Los Angeles Lakers.
The Warriors and Clippers were able to keep their big name players that could have flown the coup for so-called greener pastures, but one of the most successful franchises in the history of the game could not get anyone to bite. Could it be that the Lakers have completely lost their mojo? That’s a debate for the sports experts, but what is up for open debate is whether or not California’s taxes played a role in where players chose, or didn’t choose to sign.
There are several possible reasons that this year’s crop of free agents could have chosen other teams besides the Lakers. However, there is also a definite possibility that the state’s huge income tax rate had something to do with it. California has the nation’s highest state income tax at 13.3 percent. Could that have been a deciding factor for some of these athletes? We can’t know for sure, but when you look at the case of free agent forward LaMarcus Aldridge, you can’t help but wonder.
Aldridge left the Portland Trailblazers for the San Antonio Spurs. Aldridge twice met with the Lakers before ultimately selecting San Antonio. The difference in his tax bill is huge when you consider that Texas has no state income tax. At four years and $80 Aldridge would’ve paid roughly $10 million in state income taxes had he signed with the Lakers. That’s a huge difference. While Aldridge may have chosen the Spurs for many other reasons, it’s very likely that the tax equation had something to do with his decision.
How to Raise Children That Become Entrepreneurs
How to Raise Children That Become Entrepreneurs By Lauren Hidden Ever since my kids can remember, I’ve worked from home. Sometimes I have to remind them that I’m not sitting home playing with their toys or eating bon-bons when they’re at the babysitter or at school, but for the most part they “get it”. As…
Transferring Assets to a Second Spouse (and to children from the first)
Transferring Assets to a Second Spouse (and to children from the first) Elizabeth and Thomas Carr (names fictitious), both in their late 60s, each have one child from a prior marriage. During the 30-plus years of their marriage, they each have accumulated an estate of over $5 million. The full $1.5 million credit against estate…
The Roth IRA Advantage: A Closer Look
The Roth IRA Advantage: A Closer Look Since its debut in 1997, the Roth IRA, naturally enough, has been sold mainly as a retirement account. To be sure, the prospect of a stream of tax-free income to support a comfortable retirement is a powerful stimulant. To earn that freedom from taxes, you do have to…
Classification of Accepted Patterns of Reorganization
Classification of Accepted Patterns of Reorganization The seven acceptable patterns of reorganization may be classified into three categories: Acquisitive, Divisive, Re-capitalizing. Acquisitive reorganizations Type “A,” “B”, “C,” and acquisitive D, in which one Corporation acquires another corporation’s stock, assets, or some combination of both. Divisive reorganization Type D involves the division of one corporation into…