Lawmakers Vote To Make Three Tax Provisions for Businesses Permanent

Late last year lawmakers in Washington extended a bill that made three important tax provisions for businesses valid through December 31, 2014. That means those provisions were good for last year’s taxes, but expired when the clock struck midnight on January 1, 2015. The extension was welcome news last year for many businesses. Now there is more good news, as Congress recently voted to make those provisions permanent with a new bill: HR 636.

The three provisions in question are Section 179, Section 1374 and Section 1367(a)(2). With the Section 179 provision taxpayers would permanently be allowed to expense up to $500,000 in qualified assets, instead of just a mere $25,000 without the provision. That is a huge break for many businesses.

Provision Section 1374 has to do with corporations and how they pay taxes. S Corporations typically don’t pay corporate–level taxes. However, C corporations do pay those taxes. When a C corporation chooses to become an S corporation it and purges its assets within a 10-year period it must pay a tax on those gains. However, with Provision 1374 in place the waiting period is cut in half to just five years.

It used to be that when an S Corporation donated appreciated property to a charity it qualified for a fair market value deduction. The shareholders were then required to reduce their basis in the S Corporation’s stock. However, under the Section 1367 provision, those shareholders simply have to reduce their basis according to their share of the adjusted basis of the property that was donated.

If these provisions are passed and become law, they would greatly benefit small businesses. By knowing these provisions are permanent year-round, businesses would be able to better plan their purchases and sales throughout the year. Hopefully this bill is passed by the Senate and signed by the president.

Posted in
When Not to Name Your Spouse the Beneficiary of Your IRA

When Not to Name Your Spouse the Beneficiary of Your IRA

When Not to Name Your Spouse the Beneficiary of Your IRA By Robert Cavanaugh In most cases, naming your spouse as the beneficiary of your IRA makes the most sense. However, depending on your wishes, other beneficiary arrangements may do a better job of accomplishing your goals. First, let’s take a quick look at the…

The IRS is Not a Bully

IRS Guidance for SEC Disclosure of Listed Transaction Penalties

IRS Guidance for SEC Disclosure of Listed Transaction Penalties On August 15, 2005, the IRS issued guidance to taxpayers who are required to disclose listed transaction penalties to the SEC. Rev. Proc. 2005-51 sets forth the form, content, and timing of SEC disclosures for certain reportable transaction penalties that taxpayers are required to make pursuant…

Tax conscious investor

How to be a “Tax-Conscious” Investor

How to be a “Tax-Conscious” Investor “Uncle Sam wants you!” goes the slogan on that old poster. He also wants you to pay taxes. On the income from your employment. On what you earn from many of your investments. On a portion of the gain from the sale of those investments. But there is a…

President Going After the Wealthy Again With Proposed Tax Hikes

President Going After the Wealthy Again With Proposed Tax Hikes

President Going After the Wealthy Again With Proposed Tax Hikes By Alan Olsen, CPA, MBA (tax) Managing Partner Greenstein Rogoff Olsen & Co. LLP The divide between Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill appears to be spreading even wider after President Obama used his State of the Union Address to take dead aim at high…