Trump vs. Clinton and the Tax Plans We Could End Up With
If someone asked you to explain the differences between the two presidential candidates’ tax plans would you be able give a clear explanation? If you answered “no” most likely you aren’t alone. It’s not uncommon during a presidential election for most voters to be confused at what the candidates are actually promising or proposing. With so much back-and-forth rhetoric, it’s hard to know what each candidate really has in store.
According to Donald Trump, he wants to reduce taxes for everyone in America, especially middle-income Americans. According to numerous reports, Mr. Trump’s plan would reduce the tax system to just three tax brackets, with the top rate dropping from its current mark of 39.6 percent down to 33 percent. He also said that the wealthy would still pay their fair share, but not so much that it hinders the country’s ability to compete.
On the other hand, Hilary Clinton has yet to describe in detail what her tax plans for the middle class would be, or how they would be affected. However, she has made it clear that she wants to raise taxes on the ultra wealthy. Mrs. Clinton has stated that she wants anyone who makes more than a million dollars a year to pay a minimum of 30 percent, whether it’s from income or from capital gains. She would also like anyone who makes more than $5 million to pay an extra 4 percent.
Under Mrs. Clinton’s plan the top 1 percent would end up paying three-fourth’s of the additional taxes being collected, whereas under Mr. Trump’s plan the wealthy would be getting a tax cut of about 5.3 percent. Meantime, both candidates reportedly agree on eliminating the carried interest loophole that offers hedge fund managers a heavily discounted tax rate. Lastly, Mr. Trump wants to eliminate the estate tax completely, while Mrs. Clinton wants to raise it, as well as lower the threshold at which it starts to apply.
http://www.npr.org/2016/09/12/493573601/do-hillary-clinton-and-donald-trumps-tax-proposals-add-up
Impact ’19: Jan Geldermacher
Jan Geldermacher is President of Sprint Business. He joined the company in August 2016 and reports to CEO Michel Combes. Transcript of Impact’19: Jan Geldermacher: Alan Olsen: I’m visiting here today with Jan Geldmacher. And Jan is currently the President of Sprint, Jan Geldmacher: Business, Alan Olsen: Sprint Business and telecommunications. And, and…
Impact ’19: Stacy Lewis Daher
Stacy Lewis Daher is an experienced financial leader with a successful track record in asset management, finance, accounting, treasury, procurement, debt issuance and management, and financial planning roles at the University of San Francisco and PricewaterhouseCoopers. Transcript for Impact ’19: Stacy Lewis Daher: Alan Olsen: I’m visiting here today with Stacy Lewis. She’s…
Impact’19: James Thayer
Transcript of Impact’19: James Thayer: Alan Olsen: Can you give a background on your career path before you came over to Clark Capital Partners? James Thayer: I started out as a as an attorney doing patent litigation. My first big case was with Blackberry, Blackberry have been sued, and there was an injunction against…
Embracing Respectful Conflict
What is embracing respectful conflict? Upon hearing the phrase “embrace respectful conflict,” people often won’t have a clue what it means, but in fact, embracing respectful conflict is a key component in building trust within a team. A fact of life Almost no one agrees on everything. People have their own opinions, ideas and procedures.…