Voters in Multiple States Choose Higher Taxes for the Wealthy
Of course, the big news from the election earlier this month was that Donald Trump shocked the world and defeated Hillary Clinton in the race to become the 45th president of the United States. However, there were several other important national, as well as local, election races and issues that were decided on November 8th. Not the least of which were several state measures aimed at raising taxes on high net worth individuals.
To that end, voters in both California and Maine decided that the rich needed to pay more taxes. In Maine, the vote to raise the state’s top tax rate from 7.15 percent to 10.15 percent was extremely close, passing by a narrow 50.4 percent to 49.6 percent margin. That means Maine will have the second highest top tax rate in the country in 2017, surpassing Oregon, which was number two in 2016 at 9.9 percent.
In California, meanwhile, the vote wasn’t even close, with 62 percent voting to extend temporary tax hikes already in place. Proposition 55 extended the hikes originally implemented in 2012 with Proposition 30. That means top earners, those who make $1 million or more a year, will continue to pay a tax rate of 13.3 percent at least until 2030. California will continue to have the highest tax rate for top earners in 2017.
So, while all signs point to Donald Trump lowering the federal tax rates, if you live in California or Maine and you’re a top earner, you won’t see any relief in the coming years in your state taxes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleaebeling/2016/11/10/voters-okay-state-income-tax-hikes-for-the-rich/#71480a7b16d0
Kollectiv AI
Late one night in San Francisco, long after his kids had gone to sleep, Andrey Akselrod sat at his desk staring at a small stack of papers that had come to define his year. They were hospital bills—simple on the surface, catastrophic in practice. The visit itself had lasted only 24 hours. The aftermath stretched…
The Great Estate & Gift Tax Showdown of 2026
1. Background Current Law (2025): As of 2025, the U.S. federal estate tax imposes a 40% tax on the value of estates and lifetime gifts exceeding a unified lifetime exemption of about $13.99 million per individual (double for a married couple using “portability”)[1]. This exemption – also applicable to the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax –…
Redefining Wealth With Purpose
How Brad Connors Is Redefining Wealth With Purpose From Tragedy to Triumph When Brad Connors speaks about financial purpose, he’s not reciting a corporate mantra—he’s reliving a lifetime of lessons. At just two years old, Connors lost his father in a car accident that also left him hospitalized with a collapsed lung. That tragedy, coupled…
Marc Henn on Building True Wealth: Beyond Portfolios and Toward Purpose
When Marc Henn launched Harvest Financial Advisors nearly two decades ago, he wasn’t trying to reinvent the financial-services wheel. He was trying to realign it. After more than 35 years in the industry, Henn had seen what he calls the “black marks” of the profession—transactional mindsets, one-off sales, and the steady erosion of authentic client…